[Editorial] PPP lawmakers get slap on the wrist for violent violation of legislative process

Quite a few former and present lawmakers of the Folks Energy Social gathering have been convicted and fined by a district court docket on Thursday for utilizing violence to impede the fast-track designation of key reform payments in 2019. 

Na Kyung-won, who directed the collective use of bodily drive as flooring chief of the Liberty Korea Social gathering, the PPP’s predecessor, was fined 24 million gained (US$16,300). Former Prime Minister Hwang Kyo-ahn, who was the celebration chief exterior the meeting on the time, was fined 19 million (US$13,000), and Track Eon-seog, the present flooring chief of the PPP, was fined 11.5 million (US$7,800). Most of those fines have been imposed for aggravated obstruction of public duties. 

For violating the Nationwide Meeting Act, all convicted PPP lawmakers acquired fines under the 5 million gained (US$3,396) threshold which might result in shedding their meeting seats. Na was fined 4 million gained (US$2,717), and Track 1.5 million (US$1,019), for instance. Beneath Korean regulation, lawmakers are stripped of their seats provided that they obtain a jail sentence or a advantageous of at the very least 5 million gained particularly for violating the Nationwide Meeting Act.

Provided that the crux of this case was the violent obstruction of parliamentary procedures protected by the Nationwide Meeting Act, it’s not an overstatement to name this a lenient ruling that places the cart earlier than the horse. 

Though the lawmakers pleaded responsible, their sentences fell far wanting the jail phrases prosecutors sought. Even the fines have been uniformly set under the extent at which the lawmakers would lose their seats. It’s inevitable that the general public will query whether or not this was a calculated ruling to protect the PPP lawmakers’ seats in any respect prices. 

The court docket acknowledged that “lawmakers, who above all are sure to uphold the Structure and the regulation, used unlawful means to dam colleagues from performing their legislative duties,” recognizing the indicted lawmakers’ actions as a violation of parliamentary democracy. 

In spite of everything, these lawmakers confined a colleague within the members’ workplace constructing, stormed the payments division workplace to destroy fax machines, and tore up payments. It might have been inconceivable to not rule these harmful acts unlawful. But fairly than a wake-up name within the type of strict punishment, the court docket allowed these convicted lawmakers to retain their seats. What might have been the rationale behind this ruling?

The court docket stated that the 2019 parliamentary standoff was neither lined by lawmakers’ immunity nor justified as an act of resistance, but argued that “the defendants acted with the political motives of constructing injustices seen to the general public.” 

“The general public has additionally made its judgment on the defendants to some extent over a number of elections,” the court docket added. Nevertheless, these lawmakers have been solely in a position to run for workplace a number of occasions regardless of these violations as a result of judicial punishment was delayed for over six years. What number of Koreans will settle for such a contradictory conclusion?

Following the court docket ruling, Na claimed this was “a verdict to cease the Democratic Social gathering’s dictatorial rule over the Nationwide Meeting,” whereas Track referred to as the violations for which he was convicted “a justified act of resistance to guard parliamentary democracy.” These brazen speeches, made as if the lawmakers had been acquitted, go away the listener puzzled. The right subsequent step for these lawmakers could be to mirror on and apologize for their very own violent actions.

Please direct questions or feedback to [english@hani.co.kr]