The doorway to Seoul Nationwide College’s Gwanak Campus in southern Seoul / Korea Occasions file
Mass dishonest in on-line exams has resurfaced throughout finals at Korean universities, exposing establishments’ incomplete preparedness and ongoing struggles to ascertain efficient on-line take a look at controls and pointers for college students’ synthetic intelligence (AI) use.
In accordance with Seoul Nationwide College, Sunday, the outcomes of a last examination for a basic schooling course provided by its School of Pure Sciences have been invalidated after indicators of dishonest have been detected amongst practically half of the 36 college students enrolled.
The course was a web-based distance-learning class designed for college students on depart for obligatory army service, with each lectures and exams performed remotely.
To forestall misconduct, the examination system was set to document exercise every time test-takers opened any home windows aside from the examination display screen. A subsequent evaluate by a instructing assistant later discovered such logs for practically half of the scholars, main the college to invalidate the examination outcomes.
Nevertheless, it has been tough to conclusively set up misconduct as a result of the logs don’t point out which screens have been accessed. Because of this, the professor overseeing the course invalidated the examination outcomes and assigned various coursework, slightly than imposing disciplinary penalties on college students.
The professor famous that whereas definitive proof was missing, the size of the suspicious exercise strongly hinted at tutorial misconduct.
Seoul Nationwide College stated it was drafting “institutionwide steps” in response to what it described as “widespread dishonest.”
Reportedly, discussions are underway about making in-person exams the default, whereas turning to options for on-line assessments — together with open-book codecs, redesigned questions and assignment-based evaluations — when distant testing is unavoidable.
The college stated additionally it is transferring to introduce “campus-wide pointers on AI use.”
Below the proposed framework, instructors could be required to obviously define their AI coverage within the course syllabus, enabling college students to know the expectations prematurely. The draft pointers are at present being reviewed by way of consultations with school and college students, in accordance with the college.
The college had already been rocked by an AI-related dishonest case throughout the October midterm examination for an introductory statistics laboratory course, underscoring the urgency of stronger measures to curb tutorial misconduct.
An indication of the college stands on the fundamental gate of Yonsei College’s Seoul campus in Seodaemun District, Seoul, Dec. 1, 2024. Newsis
The wave of mass dishonest is just not confined to Seoul Nationwide College, with related circumstances resurfacing at different elite universities in Korea following AI-related dishonest scandals throughout midterm season.
Earlier this month, Yonsei College uncovered one other case of mass dishonest throughout the October midterm examination in the identical course that had been on the heart of a large-scale dishonest scandal involving the usage of synthetic intelligence.
It occurred throughout a web-based quiz taken by roughly 200 college students, the place some contributors have been discovered to have exchanged questions and solutions by way of nameless on-line chat rooms. Some have been additionally reported to have shared examination content material in actual time utilizing collaborative platforms corresponding to Google Docs.
The course is delivered by way of prerecorded on-line lectures and had already drawn allegations of educational misconduct throughout the midterm examination. In response, the college moved the ultimate examination to an in-person format, whereas on-line quizzes continued to be administered remotely.
Yonsei College has had pointers on the usage of synthetic intelligence in place since final yr and up to date them in September. However the framework stays broad and largely advisory slightly than enforceable, leaving particular person programs to use differing requirements for the usage of such instruments.
Critics say universities have largely relied on advert hoc responses — together with invalidating exams — when dishonest circumstances floor, an method they warn might deepen distrust between college students and directors as an alternative of addressing the underlying causes of educational misconduct.
