[Editorial] Coupang knowledge leak highlights must develop Korea’s class motion system

Quite a lot of lawsuits looking for damages are rising within the wake of the Coupang private knowledge leak that affected 33.37 million clients. 

The variety of folks concerned in class-action lawsuits by way of regulation corporations at the moment stands at round 200,000. It is a substantial determine, however it nonetheless represents a small minority in comparison with the size of the leak. 

Even when the claims are victorious, comparable circumstances up to now have solely resulted in every particular person receiving a payout of roughly 100,000 gained (US$68), a far cry from substantive compensation. The low quantity of compensation means the system is unable to correctly fulfill its perform of creating corporations extra vigilant.

On this case, the American class motion system is getting used. On this system, one consultant social gathering recordsdata the go well with on behalf of all victims, and as soon as a verdict is rendered, it mechanically turns into binding for all claimants. 

The deserves of this method are comfort in submitting and the efficient provision of reduction to numerous small claimants. This technique is utilized uniformly throughout normal civil proceedings, together with shopper, employment, human rights, surroundings and securities circumstances, and has grow to be established as a number one software for authorized redress within the US.

The category motion system has been adopted in Korea for the securities business, however it successfully exists in identify solely. Solely 12 fits have been heard for the reason that system was launched 20 years in the past in 2005, and fewer than half of those circumstances led to a court docket victory or settlement. 

That is due to the cumbersome procedures and restricted scope of utility put in place through the early interval to stop frivolous lawsuits. A claimant has to obtain court docket approval to file a case, and such approval could be instantly appealed, which results in years passing by earlier than the principle trial really begins. 

Eligibility can also be restricted to circumstances of false disclosure and value manipulation. Even when a case makes it to court docket, it’s tough for the claimant to safe adequate proof as a result of insufficient measures to compel defendants at hand over evidentiary supplies reminiscent of inside paperwork.

The regulation agency Daeryun has introduced plans to file a category motion lawsuit towards Coupang’s dad or mum firm within the US by the tip of the yr. Though Korean victims wouldn’t be capable to obtain any compensation from a victory on this case, it seems that the American discovery system will allow the claimants to acquire supplies on Coupang’s inside decision-making. The incident might have taken place in Korea, however the victims should depend on the category motion go well with within the US for acquiring proof.

The Coupang debacle serves as a reminder that Korea ought to have interaction in critical discussions to implement a extra substantive model of the category motion system. 

New types of large-scale harm are generally occurring in lots of fields carefully affecting customers, reminiscent of telecommunications, finance, and retail, however it’s tough to punish such actions throughout the current framework. 

We have to give the system some enamel by enhancing the punitive damages system, introducing higher discovery guidelines and drastically increasing the scope of sophistication motion fits to cowl fields by which hurt to customers is rampant. 

Please direct questions or feedback to [english@hani.co.kr]