[Column] What the media’s Mamdani-bashing missed

By Web optimization Soo-min, Hankyoreh public editor and affiliate professor at Sogang College 

Ten years in the past, I took up educating for the primary time at a public college in Philadelphia. As a result of in-state tuition at public universities prices lower than half that for out-of-state, I had many college students of coloration and of immigrant backgrounds. I keep in mind one younger man with distinctive writing abilities, who would stroll into my journalism class sporting a fast-food uniform and smelling of french fries. A pupil who was a single mom elevating two youngsters whereas working night time shifts as a hospital janitor informed me she had misplaced each her grandmother and aunt to COVID-19 in the identical week. I realized a lot from my then-20-year-old college students who had been juggling two or three jobs to make ends meet. My time with them confirmed me how flimsy the social security internet is within the US, and the way tough it’s to flee poverty within the costly metropolises of the East Coast.

Zohran Mamdani’s election as New York Metropolis’s mayor earlier this month is the counterattack from all those that have been pushed to the brink regardless of working themselves to the bone. The pent-up anger of the marginalized is probably going what made it potential for a Muslim socialist to be elected mayor on the epicenter of world capitalism. Yet one more peculiar side of Mamdani’s victory was that he gained regardless of overwhelmingly detrimental protection from main media retailers, whose assessments of him had been so harsh they bordered on condemnation.

Main this cost was The Wall Road Journal. The main enterprise newspaper printed over 50 editorials and op-eds on Mamdani up to now few months, warning that he’s a harmful agitator who lacks patriotism, and that his election may result in the collapse of New York’s economic system.

The New York Occasions, positioned additional to the left than the WSJ, was no much less crucial. In an editorial printed simply earlier than the Democratic mayoral main in June, the Occasions acknowledged it will not endorse any candidates, departing from previous apply. But, a detailed studying revealed the piece was wholly crucial of Mamdani. The editorial board argued that Mamdani, in his early 30s, has no correct political profession, not to mention administrative expertise, and crucially, fails to understand the significance of sustaining public security and combating crime in NYC. It declared his insurance policies had been “uniquely unsuited to the town’s challenges.” In impact, the board sided along with his competitor, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, whose file is sullied by corruption and sexual harassment scandals.

The Washington Submit’s editorial stance on Mamdani was almost equivalent. The paper, which has just lately been embroiled in controversy as proprietor Jeff Bezos has compromised editorial independence, detailed Mamdani’s privileged upbringing and his standing as an immigrant who just lately obtained citizenship in an editorial titled “Zohran Mamdani’s Success Is a Warning.” It lamented, “How did a socialist with virtually no governing expertise turn into New York’s mayoral frontrunner?” The editorial concluded by warning that Mamdani’s election may speed up the exodus of rich New Yorkers from the town.

Labor reporter Hamilton Nolan calls out the mainstream US media’s bashing of Mamdani in a Columbia Journalism Evaluate piece. Nolan argues that these retailers are hypocritical: they fake to be politically and socially liberal whereas prioritizing the preservation of privilege. He likened such media to “nervous suburbanites on a day journey to New York Metropolis: purses clutched tight to their sides, their palms greedy pepper spray [to stay] vigilant to the potential for an assault from a homeless individual.” 

He factors out, “Earlier than Zohran Mamdani, the one two political figures in current many years who obtained the identical degree of frequent vitriol from this slice of the pundit world had been Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump.” In Nolan’s view, this reveals the slim ideological spectrum of reasonable conservatives and liberals and exposes the structural limitations of “profitable big-city papers.” Irrespective of how dire the standard of life turns into for individuals, these media shun basic modifications and solely advocate for incremental, modest reforms.

Following Mamdani’s victory, many American media retailers have flooded the airwaves with experiences framing his success as the results of a classy social media marketing campaign which was spearheaded by Mamdani’s stylish spouse and mobilized younger voters. Nevertheless, his seemingly radical pledges — like free baby care or lease management — have both been carried out up to now or are commonplace in different international locations like Korea. The identical applies to his advocacy for Palestinian human rights, a subject taboo in mainstream American media.

On Nov. 4, when Mamdani was elected, I considered my college students in America, who are actually of their early 30s, as is Mamdani. I considered my Black college students, who, irrespective of how good, struggled to search out jobs in comparison with their middle-class white counterparts. I considered the Latina pupil who missed class for the primary time as a result of her commuter bus that got here as soon as an hour handed her cease at the hours of darkness hours of daybreak. On Nov. 8, 2016, the day Trump was first elected president, my white college students raised their voices in anger. However my college students from marginalized communities remained quiet — trembling with concern, they returned to their quick meals and cleansing jobs.

Please direct questions or feedback to [english@hani.co.kr]